The result is a product that both incorporates updated end-user and stakeholder feedback and is therefore ultimately more likely to be successful. Work can evolve based on team input, stakeholder feedback and customer opinions. These sprints allow them to identify issues, bugs or incorporate customer feedback into the design before the next sprint is performed.Īgile methodology is great for projects where the outcome is not clearly defined but the goal is. Teams typically begin with a basic project design and break it down into a small set of activities, which are reviewed, tested, and evaluated at the end of each so-called “sprint”. The agile approach is designed around flexibility. The Waterfall methodology excels when project requirements are fairly static, but would not be adequate for the delivery of a complex product that could change frequently and abruptly. This means that a solid understanding must be met and shared by all parties. Since this plan is sequential and linear, any changes become relatively costly and time-consuming. Nevertheless, it is easy to see how this methodology is less flexible than the alternatives. It is easy to manage, comes with specific deliverables and well-defined starting and ending points. The more strict, linear nature of the Waterfall methodology makes it the perfect choice for simple, specific activities. This means that when each of the Waterfall steps is successfully completed, the team moves on to the following step. Waterfall is a sequential methodology based on a clearly defined scope that centers on the collection of preliminary requirements and then follows a set order.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |